
The COVID-19 pandemic is getting used to facilitate the efforts of a choose few to create a one-world authorities with energy concentrated within the palms of an elitist group of billionaires.
In March 2020, the United Nations New World Order (UNNWO) introduced their annual Worldwide Day of Happiness world marketing campaign, together with a name for solidarity and unity within the world struggle in opposition to COVID-19.1 The marketing campaign theme, based on UNNWO, was:2
“… a name on all 7.Eight billion members of the worldwide human household, and all 206 nations and territories of planet earth, to unite in solidarity, and steadfast resolve, in preventing again in opposition to the COVID 19 Coronavirus …”
Whereas the UNNWO sustainability objectives, comparable to addressing poverty, starvation, polluted waterways, and extra, sound admirable,3 they depend on one-world authorities manipulations comparable to media censorship, mass surveillance of residents and whole governmental management of your well being care choices, as I’ll clarify intimately on this article.
One clear instance of the hazards of one-world initiatives is the World Well being Group’s Immunization Agenda 2030, wherein the purpose is to vaccinate everybody throughout the globe.4
Invoice Gates of the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis, a giant WHO funder, has said he intends to vaccinate the worldwide inhabitants in opposition to COVID-19,5 after which observe and monitor every particular person by way of digital surveillance.6 The Rockefeller Basis additionally helps mass-tracking of the citizenry — all beneath the guise of “public well being.”7 The reasoning for that is to cease the pandemic.
However, will a gigantic world illness surveillance system created beneath the pretext of COVID-19 be dismantled as soon as the pandemic is asserted over? Or, will it merely morph into different surveillance capabilities additionally offered as mechanisms to guard the “public well being?”
Vaccine Mania Has Gripped the Nation
Because the COVID-19 pandemic handed its six-month mark and the quantity of reported instances in some international locations and states rose, the deal with a vaccine intensified, with quite a few vaccine makers vying to be first with outcomes.
That distinction got here in mid-July, when the preliminary outcomes from a scientific trial of a vaccine candidate developed by Moderna, sponsored by the Nationwide Institute of Allergy and Infectious Illnesses, obtained a optimistic write-up in The New England Journal of Drugs (NEJM)8 and happy Wall Avenue.9
What’s fascinating is that Moderna has “by no means produced an accepted vaccine or run a big trial,” based on Stat Information. But, it seized the COVID-19 alternative10 and cast forward. When you concentrate on it, although, the exuberance over the vaccine candidate is irrational.
First, as with all vaccines, adversarial results can and can typically happen. Even fiercely pro-vaccine advocates have expressed issues about doable adversarial results of a hurried-up COVID-19 vaccine.
From Invoice Gates11 (extra on that later on this article) to Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier,12 to rotavirus vaccine inventor Dr. Paul Offit13 — who as soon as held the Merck-endowed chair in vaccinology14 at The Youngsters’s Hospital of Philadelphia — high-profile people are speaking about it.
Offit expressed reservations about how briskly the vaccine firms have been pushing growth of the vaccine, and warned of doable security and efficacy issues that might happen from giving it to 1000’s of individuals “with out a big security and efficacy trial.”
Frazier had related issues, with a extra strongly-worded remark: “If you are going to use a vaccine on billions of individuals, you higher know what that vaccine does.” Alongside that very same line of pondering is the priority — as with all vaccines — that the immunity and/or length isn’t assured as a result of the “immunity” isn’t naturally acquired.
One other concern is that contact tracing and pc apps to find out the whereabouts and contacts of a one that could have been uncovered are a lot too aggressive. For instance, even when somebody has no signs of COVID-19, governments, whether or not native or nationwide, will have the flexibility to quarantine an individual in opposition to their will, based on a YouTuber who recounts her contact tracing coaching in a video.15
Furthermore, based on high authorized scholar Alan Dershowitz,16 a 115-year-old U.S. Supreme Court docket ruling permits authorities to legally inoculate somebody with a vaccine in opposition to their will for the aim of safeguarding public well being. Alternatively, they can not accomplish that if the vaccine is meant solely to guard an individual’s private well being, he says.
Whereas different authorized students debate simply how far the federal authorities can go along with this,17 such threats to your rights and well being proceed to develop. And, sure media teams, who must be supporters of free speech, are main the cost to take away your free speech rights. Standing on the forefront, the liberal “fact-checking” group Media Issues is attempting to discredit vaccine security teams who they consider might stand in the way in which of worldwide vaccination.18
Media Issues Pushes Censorship of Vaccine Security Teams
A smear piece from Media Issues, titled “The Most Infamous Anti-Vax Teams Use Fb to Lay the Groundwork In opposition to the Novel Coronavirus Vaccine,”19 lays the groundwork for discrediting the Nationwide Vaccine Info Heart (NVIC), Youngsters’s Well being Protection and Knowledgeable Consent Motion Community. The article begins by casting such teams as a menace throughout COVID-19:20
“As novel coronavirus instances spike within the U.S. and quite a few efforts are underway to develop a vaccine, essentially the most distinguished U.S. anti-vaccination organizations are utilizing Fb and different social media platforms to poison the effectively in opposition to a possible vaccine.”
Media Issues is offended that Fb permits the teams’ social media communications to look academic quite than branding them as “vaccine misinformation.” This is particularly vital, writes Media Issues, as a result of assist for vaccination among the many basic public is falling:21
“Assist within the U.S. for vaccination typically has been on a downward pattern for the previous twenty years. A January 2020 ballot launched by Gallup discovered that 84% of People consider it’s ‘vital’ to vaccinate kids, down from 94% in 2001.
The ballot discovered that assist for vaccination has declined ‘amongst nearly all subgroups of the U.S. public.’ Gallup attributed the decline in assist for vaccination to the unfold of false details about vaccines, specifically the debunked hyperlink between vaccines and autism.”
Vaccination Is Turning into a Arduous Promote
Media Issues cites a 2014 examine revealed within the journal Pediatrics22 that recognized 4 methods wherein the desirability of vaccination is promoted and the way none of the messages is working. The 4 makes an attempt to “scale back vaccine misperceptions and improve vaccination charges for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR)” have been listed by the journal as:23
- Info explaining the shortage of proof that MMR causes autism from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention
- Textual details about the hazards of the illnesses prevented by MMR from the Vaccine Info Assertion
- Photos of kids who’ve illnesses prevented by the MMR vaccine
- A dramatic narrative about an toddler who nearly died of measles from a Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention truth sheet
Nevertheless, the messages are usually not working and presumably even backfiring, says Media Issues.24 [And] “… makes an attempt to ‘appropriate false claims about vaccines could also be particularly more likely to be counterproductive.'”
The messages seemingly backfire as a result of Massive Pharma and its buddy, Massive Biotech, endure from a credibility drawback — within the case of Massive Pharma, from the numerous drugs it has withdrawn after assuring the general public they have been protected.25 Furthermore, “anti-vaccination content material” — as Media Issues calls it — could be extra compelling than messages designed to promote vaccination:26
“One other destructive consider play at Fb and different social media shops is that analysis means that anti-vaccination content material tends to be extra fashionable than pro-vaccine content material and anti-vaccine messages …”
The messages are additionally seemingly ringing stronger with youthful individuals who are usually the largest customers of social media, Media Issues admits:27
“In line with a report from Heart for Countering Digital Hate … People who ‘use social media greater than conventional media to entry information and updates about Covid’ say that they are going to get vaccinated in opposition to coronavirus at a charge 10 factors decrease in comparison with these who primarily eat conventional media.”
Media Issues Has a Big Affect on Mainstream Media
Media Issues’ preliminary $2 million in funding got here from rich progressives by way of the Tides Basis,28 with further funding from MoveOn.org and the New Democrat Community, in accordance to Nationwide Evaluate.29 In 2010, George Soros, one of the richest individuals within the world, gave the group $1 million, based on The New York Instances.30
The self-proclaimed “truth checking group,” based by conservative-turned-progressive David Brock,31 states that its mission is to counteract conservative media, and it has been very profitable. In line with the Each day Caller:32
“The group scored its first vital public coup in 2007 with the firing of host Don Imus from MSNBC. Simply earlier than Easter that 12 months, a Media Issues worker recorded Imus’s now-famous assault on the Rutgers ladies’s basketball staff, and instantly acknowledged its inflammatory potential.
The group swung into motion, notifying organizations just like the NAACP, the Nationwide Affiliation of Black Journalists, and Al Sharpton’s Nationwide Motion Community, all of which joined the struggle … By the top of the week, Imus was fired.”
Media Issues then enlisted the Nationwide Hispanic Media Coalition, League of United Latin American Residents and related teams to strain CNN advertisers to oust anchor Lou Dobbs from CNN for alleged racist feedback.33 In November 2009, Dobbs left CNN, and the Each day Caller quotes a Media Issues staffer who stated, “We obtained him fired.”34
Media Issues additionally launched what they dubbed a “marketing campaign to reveal Glenn Beck’s racist rhetoric in an effort to coach advertisers concerning the practices on his present.” The marketing campaign facilitated his departure from Fox Information.35
Media Issues can be capable of place their biased tales in mainstream shops as actual information. In line with the Each day Caller, sources from the group bragged about planting tales in The Washington Put up, San Francisco Chronicle, Los Angeles Instances and on blogs such because the Each day Kos, Salon and HuffPost. In addition they reported a heat reception at The New York Instances:36
“Jim Rainey on the LA Instances took so much of our stuff,” the staffer continued. “So did Joe Garofoli on the San Francisco Chronicle. We have pushed tales to Eugene Robinson and E.J. Dionne [at the Washington Post]. Brian Stelter on the New York Instances was useful.
Ben Smith [formerly of Politico, now at BuzzFeed.com] will take tales and write what you need him to write down,” defined the previous worker, whose account was confirmed by different sources. Staffers at Media Issues “knew they might dump stuff to Ben Smith, they knew they might dump it at Plum Line [Greg Sargent’s Washington Post blog], in order that’s the place they despatched it.”
As described by Sharyl Attkisson, the affect of Media Issues is of concern to everybody:37
“The drawback is, too many information organizations and even journalism teams comparable to Poynter use Media Issues and their associates as if they’re reliable information sources. They’re both unforgivably ignorant of Media Issues’ slants — or select to maintain readers at the hours of darkness as a result of they agree with the slant.
One main curiosity Media Issues and its associates have served over time is that of the pharmaceutical trade. They usually smear scientists and journalists who report on prescription drug and vaccine questions of safety, falsely labelling them as ‘anti-vaccine.’ In fact, that is like saying that as a result of I broke information about issues with Firestone tires, I’m ‘anti-tire,’ or as a result of I have uncovered fraud inside charities, I’m ‘anti-charity.’ Foolish.”
COVID-19 and Vaccines Are a Pathway to Billionairehood
Forbes compiled an inventory of 10 well being care billionaires who’ve profited since COVID-19 was declared a world pandemic. Topping the listing was Stéphane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, whose vaccine candidate trial outcomes have been revealed by NEJM.38 In accordance to Forbes:39
“When the WHO declared a pandemic, Bancel’s estimated web price was some $720 million. Since then, Moderna’s inventory has rallied greater than 103%, lifting his fortune to an estimated $1.5 billion. A French citizen, Bancel first joined the billionaire ranks on April 2, when Moderna’s inventory rose on the information that the agency was planning to start part two trials of its vaccine.”
Bancel is way from the one one that has develop into a “biotech billionaire” because of the profitable growth of COVID-19 vaccines, therapies and diagnostic instruments solicited by governments and funded by taxpayers. Others embrace:40
1. Gustavo Denegri — With a web price of $4.5 billion, Denegri has a 45% stake within the Italian biotech firm DiaSorin.
2. Search engine marketing Jung-Jin — With a web price of $8.Four billion, Jung-Jin co-founded Celltrion, a biopharma firm in Seoul.
3. Alain Mérieux — With a web price of $7.6 billion, Mérieux’s grandfather based BioMérieux, a French multinational biotech firm.
4. Maja Oeri — With a web price of $3.2 billion, Oeri is a descendent of Fritz Hoffmann-La Roche, the founder of pharmaceutical big Roche and owns about 5% of Roche’s shares.
5. Leonard Schleifer — With a web price of $2.2 billion, Schleifer’s wealth is attributed to Regeneron Prescription drugs, which he co-founded.
6. George Yancopoulos — With a web price of $1.2 billion, Yancopoulos is Regeneron’s chief scientific officer.
7. and eight. Thomas and Andreas Struengmann — With a web price of $6.9 billion, the Struengmann twins offered their generic drug firm Hexal to Novartis in 2005 and produce other biotech investments.
9. Li Xiting — With a web price of $12.6 billion, Xiting cofounded Mindray Medical Worldwide, China’s largest medical tools producer.
Pandemic Profiteering Has Elevated the Wealth Hole
The U.S. has been noteworthy for its excessive wealth and earnings inequality, and the richest have develop into even richer from pandemic profiteering, based on the Institute for Coverage Research:41
“Between January 1, 2020 and April 10, 2020, 34 of the nation’s wealthiest 170 billionaires noticed their wealth improve by tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars}. Eight have seen their web price surge by over $1 billion.
As of April 15, Jeff Bezos’s [Amazon’s founder] fortune had elevated by an estimated $25 billion since January 1, 2020. This unprecedented wealth surge is bigger than the Gross Home Product of Honduras, $23.9 billion in 2018.”
The wealth of the world’s high 5 billionaires — Jeff Bezos, Invoice Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffett and Larry Ellison — elevated twice as a lot because the federal authorities paid in stimulus checks to greater than 150 million People.42
And as talked about earlier, and famous by Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the NVIC,43 Moderna’s inventory value ballooned when it introduced that its messenger RNA vaccine was prepared for scientific trials,44 and the corporate’s CEO turned “a brand new billionaire in a single day.”
Questions Concerning the Moderna Vaccine
Authors of The New England Journal of Drugs article, cited earlier, wrote that the Moderna vaccine candidate, named mRNA-1273, “induced anti–SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in all contributors, and no trial-limiting security issues have been recognized.” The examine staff did notice, nevertheless, “Solicited adversarial occasions that occurred in additional than half the contributors included fatigue, chills, headache, myalgia, and ache on the injection website.”45
However, in accordance to Simply The Information, adversarial results weren’t at all times that minor, particularly after a second injection:46
“Notably, each participant within the two larger-dose teams reported adversarial reactions after their second injections. One examine participant within the smallest-dose group, in the meantime, was eliminated as a consequence of having developed hives after the primary spherical of injections.”
Along with adversarial results, scientists are questioning how lengthy immunity in opposition to the coronavirus, instructed by the presence of antibodies, will final.
In line with Zero Hedge, immunity sturdiness could also be so short-lived, a COVID-19 vaccine “would possibly have to be administered yearly to supply a dependable stage of safety.”47 That can definitely be a windfall for the biotech billionaires. Zero Hedge writes:48
“[A] examine produced by researchers at King’s Faculty London is exhibiting recovered sufferers’ antibodies declined considerably inside months of an infection, elevating the crucial query of whether or not a vaccine might ever present lasting safety.
Moderna’s vaccine candidate has proven the capability to provide antibodies in check topics, nevertheless it’s nonetheless unclear precisely how a lot safety this would possibly present.
College of Nottingham Emeritus Professor in Immunology Herb Sewell, who consulted on the examine, stated it appeared to indicate that antibodies to the virus disappeared extra shortly than antibodies for MERS and different coronaviruses …
A number of excessive profile research have raised doubts about whether or not these antibodies are everlasting, or efficient, or not.”
Lastly, the adversarial results of vaccines typically are so well-known, even Invoice Gates — who is arguably the world’s most passionate vaccine advocate — admits that as many as 700,000 might develop into victims of adversarial reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine. In line with the German web site Ken FM, in an interview with CNBC Gates stated:49
“… if we have now … one in ten thousand negative effects … that is, you realize, far more — 700,000 … individuals who will endure from that. So, actually understanding the security at gigantic scale throughout all age ranges — you realize — pregnant, male, feminine, undernourished and present comorbidities, it’s totally, very onerous …
… that precise determination of‚ OK, let’s go and provides this vaccine to your entire world, governments must be concerned as a result of there can be some threat and indemnification wanted earlier than that may be selected.”
Since that interview, a number of bloggers and media watchers have twisted Gates’ phrases as deaths, which has triggered one other media “fact-checker,” APF Truth Test,50 to name them out for it. So, in case you do share this data, please notice it is negative effects — which might embrace deaths, but additionally something from a light-weight fever to a really critical, however not life-threatening occasion — that Gates particularly talked about.
The Empire of Billionaires Is a Risk to Public Security
In abstract, as biotech billionaires rush in to revenue from the COVID-19 pandemic, your privateness rights are being violated by way of monitoring and speak to tracing, and your proper to refuse a vaccine could also be in jeopardy whether it is deemed for the general public good. At the identical time the very media that must be selling your proper to free speech and to query authorities’s choices on your physique is advocating for having these rights taken away.
By the pursuit of a man-made vaccine, pure immunity to viruses like COVID-19 is not going to happen and future pandemics are assured. However which means mass vaccination must be repeated time and again, which is nice information for the pandemic profiteers. However is it good for you?