This text is a part of the On Tech e-newsletter. You may enroll right here to obtain it weekdays.

Small satellites may assist convey web entry to extra of the world’s residents. That’s cool.

You understand what’s uncool? Wealthy dudes preventing over whose house toys are higher.

Let me let you know in regards to the satellite tv for pc spat between Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos, the expertise they’re engaged on and the dangers of over counting on tech to deal with advanced issues.

Right here goes: Musk’s SpaceX rocket firm, Amazon and different wealthy corporations are engaged on networks of comparatively small satellites that beam web entry to the bottom. These networks orbit at decrease ranges than standard satellites and are cheaper to make and launch.

Proponents say that these networks can broaden web service, notably in distant areas, to ships at sea and in different hard-to-reach spots. Comparable small satellites are getting used for different tasks corresponding to monitoring wildfires. There are drawbacks, however we ought to be excited in regards to the prospects.

This week’s tiff began as a result of SpaceX desires permission from the U.S. authorities to maneuver a few of its satellites to decrease orbits. Amazon stated that might intrude with its satellites. Musk bought indignant. Amazon stated that SpaceX was making an attempt to “smother competitors within the cradle.” (Aspect observe: America’s dominant on-line retailer most likely shouldn’t accuse others of smothering competitors.)

Often I really like to observe wealthy individuals squabble. The Kardashians! However this time … ugh.

I perceive why SpaceX and Amazon need to persuade a U.S. company. However I hope that the trash speaking doesn’t distract them from necessary questions: Is that this satellite tv for pc expertise the perfect method to assist get billions of extra individuals on-line? Or is that this one other probably misdirected effort to throw difficult expertise at a posh human downside?

Put extra merely: Is that this a good suggestion?

We ought to be excited by formidable expertise however not blinded by it. In contrast with even 1000’s of satellites, the perfect present web pipes can carry much more internet site visitors. Satellite tv for pc web nonetheless sometimes requires specialised gear on the bottom, which isn’t straightforward to construct or pay for. These rising web tasks is likely to be a really useful complement quite than an alternative to established web infrastructure. That’s one actuality.

The opposite actuality is that if you need expertise to vary the lives of billions of individuals, you additionally should take into consideration … what’s that phrase? Ah sure: individuals.

Even in a wealthy nation like the US, individuals don’t lack web entry solely as a result of the expertise isn’t as much as snuff. There are additionally misguided authorities insurance policies, structural inequalities, the necessity by many to spend cash on extra speedy necessities and extra.

Which means bringing extra individuals on-line in the US — to not point out the remainder of the world — can’t be executed by expertise alone. We additionally have to suppose holistically in regards to the limitations to web entry amongst people and society.

Look, billionaires can snipe at one another, obsess over rocket protocols, and take into consideration authorities insurance policies and human motivations. However even billionaires should prioritize. In the event that they and the remainder of us fixate on profitable a “house race,” they danger failing to place individuals first. (Or they might be motivated by earning money quite than bringing the world on-line. They will do each, I feel.)

The satellite tv for pc back-and-forth made me replicate on this interview with Tracy Chou, who developed software program to assist filter out harassing on-line posts. She stated that some corporations need to consider smarter expertise can clear up all the pieces. It could’t.

Everybody from Consultant Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to the right-wing persona Ben Shapiro declared the inventory buying and selling app Robinhood a villain on Thursday. Robinhood likes to say that it allows anybody to enter cloistered monetary markets. Its critics stated the corporate messed with the free markets to squash the little man.

However this week’s story could have been easier: A bumbling firm was unhealthy at cash.

What occurred: Hordes impressed by a Reddit group have been serving to to drive up the inventory costs of GameStop and different corporations. Robinhood and another inventory brokerages this week then restricted clients’ transactions within the gyrating shares. Individuals bought mad and stated that Robinhood was making an attempt to guard wealthy buyers from dropping to minnow on-line merchants.

However perhaps Robinhood didn’t have cash? Stockbrokers like Robinhood are legally required to have sufficient money to pay clients, cowl losses and have a cushion if issues go mistaken. This week appeared to pressure Robinhood’s means to do this, and my colleagues reported that the buying and selling platform wanted to boost $1 billion in emergency money.

What’s the lesson right here? My colleague Andrew Ross Sorkin requested an necessary query: Is there one thing mistaken with Robinhood that it didn’t have sufficient money with out emergency funding or chopping off clients? My DealBook colleagues requested: Is Robinhood’s enterprise mannequin damaged?

Additionally, perhaps everybody ought to tweet much less and ask monetary regulators extra questions.

Take note of how Robinhood makes cash: It’s a very good second to reread my colleague Nathaniel Popper’s article on the individuals damage by rapid-fire inventory buying and selling and the way Robinhood attracts younger People into dangerous monetary transactions.

And these no-fee inventory buying and selling apps could also be much less democratic than you suppose. Robinhood and its opponents receives a commission by Wall Avenue corporations who do the precise inventory trades, and attempt to squeeze a couple of pennies from the transactions over what Robinhood clients pay. It is a longstanding trade apply and never inherently unhealthy. However getting paid by Wall Avenue giants doesn’t match Robinhood’s picture of empowering the plenty to beat the wealthy.

Earlier than we go …

• The Twitter mob for a company agenda: My colleague Adam Satariano examines how one firm harnessed the strategies of social media manipulation sometimes utilized by authoritarian governments to advertise its coverage targets.

• The thriller of Google’s deleted paragraph: A human rights group criticized Google for opening pc facilities in Saudi Arabia. The corporate then altered a weblog publish about its Saudi venture. Protocol defined what occurred.

• Heat climate, a Bitcoin-friendly mayor and (purely coincidentally) decrease taxes: Please get pleasure from my colleague Nellie Bowles writing in regards to the kite-surfing golf equipment and different cultural modifications as titans from expertise decamp to Miami. One relocation firm is asking it “Mass Techxodus.”

Hugs to this

An exquisite snowy owl was noticed in New York’s Central Park this week for the primary time in additional than a century. Have a look at this owl staring down crows! (Alas, the owl appears to have left the park.)

We need to hear from you. Inform us what you consider this article and what else you’d like us to discover. You may attain us at ontech@nytimes.com.